

Dynamo Boring? Not!
By: Marc | November 15th, 2007In an article in the New York Sun, Paul Gardner disses both the Houston Dynamo and the New England Revolution as boring, defensive teams. He writes:
We had the same finalists a year ago, and they produced a turnoff classic, a game that was dreadful beyond any telling of it. The good news about this year’s final is that it has to be better than last year’s, if only because it cannot possibly be worse.
Now I’m certainly not going to defend last year’s title game as a classic (though the overtime was exciting), but I resent Gardner’s assertion that the Dynamo aren’t an attacking team. It seems to me he’s basing his opinion on last year’s final and hasn’t watched any Dynamo games this year.
Sure they have the best defense in the league (a new MLS record), but this is a team that never stops attacking. They play some of the most beautiful soccer in the league: one-touch passes, lovely build-up play, and some fine finishing from the entire team. They are the best team I’ve ever seen: no superstars, no egos, just a bunch of hard-working castoffs of other teams that pull together and do the impossible (I’m including the San Jose guys that are the core of this Dynamo team).
Where does Gardner get off writing this outrageous statement:
The Dynamo’s playoff games have been full of incident, lively enough, without featuring much by way of good soccer.
Oh come on! Granted, there were times in the Dallas match where they were just grinding it out, but there was some excellent soccer in there as well. The Kansas City match was just brilliant. Both matches were terrific to watch with tons of goal-scoring chances. How could that be called boring and defensive? I saw a post on Big Soccer that just fifteen minutes into the K.C. game was saying it was ten times more entertaining the entire NE/Chicago game and I’d have to agree.
Now I doubt that we’ll see a hugely lopsided result on Sunday (though it could happen). I suspect it’ll be tight and it’ll be a real battle. But what’s wrong with that? As long as there are goal-scoring chances created, it’ll be a fun game to watch, and lately Houston’s been working hard to generate tons of chances and it’s been a blast to watch. I’m looking forward to Sunday and I sure hope Houston prove Gardner wrong.
So, do you agree with Paul or me?
– Marc
![]() |
MLS Forums | Houston Results |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



That guy is an idiot. Yeah, the Dynamo have the best defense in the team, but they are a hell of an attacking team. The best part of the attacking is that the defenders get in, and in the counter attack Dynamo defenders are back and defending.
Posted from
United States

-



Champsionship games are always more defenseively oriented with so much riding on the game. This is true for just about every sport including football!
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed













